Brexit ruling: A rejoinder to User flayman

This is a rejoinder for User flayman. The preceding conversation that led to this rejoinder can be seen on this link

After re-reading your posts, I thought I would write a slightly more detailed rejoinder.

I will go through them one by one. However, before that I might as well give a broader perspective of what is happening.

The discussion on this issue has the problem of it working out just the technical aspects of a very minute element in the national history, when actually the whole history of the nation is being dismantled on every aspect.

The wider perspective is that GB and also all the other native-English nations have been quite gullible and foolish since the very beginning period of colonial years. And totally gullible and foolish after the WW2. I will leave that topic here, for it is quite a very big topic.

When going for a razor sharp technical examination of the present quandary with regard to Brexit, the scene is comparable with that of a doctor putting full focus on the minute aspects of a minor disease, when actually the whole body is infected with all kinds of malignancies.

QUOTE: Her Majesty is effectively the claimant, and she won.” END OF QUOTE.

Isn’t it quite obvious that academic detailing and defining have brought in some kind of mad levels of understandings?

These kinds of utter nonsensical academic derivations are what has been the undoing of all native-English nations.

Any totally formally-uneducated person on the streets in any location in the world can see through the nonsense. For, Her Majesty has not won in any sense of this word in almost all languages.

This more or less reflects the history of English colonialism.  For in most colonial locations, it was a most welcome event for the local populations. However, there were the traditional upper-classes of these locations inside England to redefine everything into similar absurd visualisations.

QUOTE: I’m not sure about the issue you raise of wiping out the English political entity END OF QUOTE.

From inside England, the nation might seem quite formidable and unassailable. However the universally mentioned fact in most other languages is that England is very small and can be encroached upon and devoured in pieces. All that has to be done is to enter in minute numbers as would termites and to eat up the vitals. This is going on in a very rapid way as of now.

I am privy to conversations in languages which native-Englishmen cannot understand, wherein it is very openly mentioned that England is more or less up for grabbing.

Continental Europe might be the least of problems for England. And yet, see the tremendous preoccupation that England has to be engaged in to mitigate this minute issue.

It should be mentioned that a more or less precise prediction as to what would happen with regard to this Euro-Connection had been done at least a decade and a half earlier. See these links



There is something about English and Englishmen (and women) which is more or less unique. It has nothing to do with DNA or genes or genius, or pedigree or ethnicity. It is that they speak native-English and used to be connected socially and by family to Englishmen and women, of whatever class.

I can’t deal more about this here. I can only say that this uniqueness is that in all kinds of communications, it gives a sort of elevated personal stature to the individuals.

In feudal language nations, a similar kind of stature is condoned, if seen in a higher. However, if exhibited by a person defined as lower in such nations, it can be treated as rank impertinence. And can stir-up a sort of homicidal mania in the other-side.

If England joins Europe as an equal, this very specific factor would create a huge social communication irritant across the continent (a few European nations would be exceptions).

Being a superior outsider to a social system and being part of the system are two entirely different experiences in feudal languages.

In fact, this feature of English social communication has indeed created many problems for them even during the colonial period.

Unacknowledged Englishmen who displayed their native communication stature had their limbs and lips cut in the South Asian subcontinent, which was erroneously called India.

See this narration by James Scurry who was made a servant of some subordinate staff of Sultan Tipu of a minor kingdom in the South Asian subcontinent.

As of now, the situation is getting more dangerous. See what happened to the British sailors who were taken to a police station in India.

A native-Englishman or child under a feudal language speaker is quite a different person from a native-Englishman or child above a feudal language speaker. These are all powerful information about which England has no idea at all.

QUOTE: fast transactions of today does not really apply to the business of legislature, END OF QUOTE.

QUOTE: it does arise out of a history of the absolute power of the monarchy such as it once was in feudal times. END OF QUOTE

Well, this is the tragedy that modern-day democracy has heaped upon native-English nations. Even though you might speak about the great dictatorial powers of autocratic monarchs, the fact is that if the monarchs and the people are both native-English speakers who live and interact in pristine-English, both these terrors you mention are actually in the realm of pure fantasy and imagination.

All the great political and social issues mentioned and discussed in England with precocious diligence are actually mere nothings. What is experienced in feudal language nations have nothing to do with these ludicrous levels of intellectual meditations. What England debates are of issues, which if taken in comparative terms, of mere 2 cm ambit, and that of feudal language nations are of 1km ambit.

In fact, there is no correlation with the various thoughts on social studies, political studies, international relationship studies, and even psychological studies, between a native-Englishman’s ambience and that of a feudal language speaker’s mental and social ambience.

This is one of the terrible truths that are withheld from the purview of a native-English mind. What gets conveyed is lost in the translation version.

The above-mentioned item has nothing to do with individual goodness and badness.

The above is only one minor aspect of the quoted item.

The words ‘absolute power of the monarchy’ and ‘feudal times’ are at best totally un-understood or under-understood items.

The wider issue is that the item called Legislature is most evidently a very dangerous and wasteful entity, as per your quoted words. What a monarch decide and act upon in a few seconds or minutes or hours or days, has now been stretched beyond all logical lengths of time and expense. All to choose just one from most probably two possibilities.

I can propose that democracy in native-English nations has gone insane, useless and totally dangerous to the kingdom. In fact, democracy is good in England only if it contains only native-Englishmen. If outsiders, whose mind and quite powerful mental links are not understood, are allowed inside the apparatus of English democracy, terrible despoilment of the nation is in the offing.

When I mention ‘quite powerful mental links are not understood’, I know what I am speaking about. However there is no conceivable manner in which I can convey this information to a native-Englishman or woman. For, it is like an animal trying to convey its social experience to human beings. There are things that have no corresponding items on the other side.

If it is the fear of a despotic English monarch that is inspiring this traumatic item called legislature and democracy, it is indeed a very tragic understanding. Ancient English monarch had their own terrors to deal with. And they cannot be compared with an oriental or African or even a Continental European monarch. There are differences that cannot be defined in a few words.

[King Richard of England was not an English king, and did not speak English, I am told. I speak of English monarchs, who speak natively in English.]

The best way to study English Monarchy is by first understanding what is different about pristine-English from feudal languages. The next item would be to totally disconnect English monarchy from other monarchies when taking up the study. The next item would be to understand why Englishmen and women were different from others.

QUOTE: This does not mean that the referendum is invalid END OF QUOTE.

The word referendum might mean something like an opinion poll. However, it has its defining power. For instance, the people of Kashmir have been demanding for a referendum since 1947, when the British-Indian army (handed over to the new nation of India) marched into the location and occupied it. If Referendum was just an opinion with doubtful value, India would have conducted it.

However, India will not do it. Unless there is some intervention by providence and Nemesis.

QUOTE: It does not contain any requirement for the UK Government to implement the results of the referendum, END OF QUOTE.

Speaking of the two Referendums done in the last few months in Great Britain, take the first one. If the pro-independence side of Scottish referendum had won, would it have been treated in a similar tone?

I am sure that within a couple of months of the results coming out, Scotland would have been apart.

Now, take the second one. If the pro-Europe side had won the referendum, would the argument that the government need not mind the referendum results that be acceptable?

Well no!

These types of arguments and counter arguments are best suited for some academic debate forum. To allow such things to dictate national policymaking is the tragic side of democracy in a planar-language nation.

QUOTE: The judiciary is subordinate to Parliament. The government is subordinate to Parliament. At the end of the day, even the Queen is subordinate to Parliament if Parliament in its supreme capacity passes law that abolished the monarchy END OF QUOTE

This is Political Science in its worst attire.

When the national enemies have gathered at the national borders, to depend upon and to spend time on such useless textbook ideas of national structures and command lines is being utterly treacherous.

Take up an alternative vision of the kingdom.

A totally different version. One which should shock the outsiders into tremulous disquiet.

It is England. Three other nationalities are connected to England on their own will, and at the pleasure of England. That is, if England does not want them, they can be disconnected.

England is a kingdom and not a nation. People are not citizens, but subjects.

The kingdom’s language is English and only English. No feudal languages are allowed inside. For, feudal languages spread social disarray, discrimination and inequities which are not detectable through English.

The kingdom is owned by the kingdom.

The Monarchy heads the kingdom. People joined to each other in pristine-English are attached to the Monarchy as subjects.

The Monarchy stands for the kingdom and its native people.

The monarch is the supreme dispenser of all rights and justices.

The monarch will decide which outsider can be given subject-hood and for how long.

People who indulge in subversive activities can be exiled by the monarch.

Political decisions are taken by the monarch, not on the basis of protracted legislative and judicial processing. But on a very time-based agenda, focusing on the exigency of the moment and the issue.

People who speak against the native people can be exiled by the monarch. People who had spoken against the native people can be stopped from entering the nation.

Let the parliament be placed as an advisory body.

Dissuade party-based elections. For, it only leads to the splintering of the social fabric. Beyond that, outsider vested interests can misuse the situation to gather a lot of rights for themselves. In fact, democratic election is actually a breech through which outsiders can take-over the kingdom.

When one reads the terrible ideas above, the visuals of some terrible barbarian despotic rule could emerge. But then, the fact is that when pristine-English is the national language, no such thing will happen.

QUOTE: nor set a time limit by which a vote to leave the EU should be implemented. END OF QUOTE.

During the colonial times, there was a fabulous farsightedness in the English colonial administration everywhere and at times in England also. This was due to the fact that decisions were taken on the spot and implemented.

The above quoted words are the issue. The referendum’s actual agenda when seen in words do bespeak a lot of deficiencies. There should have been a very pointed wording on what it wishes to accomplish. Words which do not lead to a logical conclusion are useless. There should be very specific wording on what the results can mean and what it cannot mean.

To read and enjoy the utter lack of logic in the sentences does not help.

To conduct a national event which at best has no judicial or statutory value and has a lot of loopholes for the outsider lobbies to perch upon, is a very useless activity.

QUOTE: which enables the electorate to voice an opinion which then influences the Government in its policy decisions. END OF QUOTE

Has the British government gone so insipid that it couldn’t understand that if only a public opinion to influence a policy decision was all that was intended, there are indeed online public opinion gathering website which does this work fabulously. Is there any difference between for instance this and what the referendum did?

In other words, does the EU Referendum have only the same value? Both are dealing with terrible themes, both connected at the code levels on comparable codes.

QUOTE: But those who would criticise these judges END OF QUOTE

There might be a broader item here. A judge is just an individual. However, one would not treat judicial decree as a nondescript individual’s opinion. For, he or she is part of a statutory machine.

If this be so, what is wrong in visualising the monarch also as part of a huge statutory machine, with similar and yet much more powerful rights of deciding?

One problem with discussing the English monarchy is that it is easy to identify the monarch with an individual. However, it is not an individual but an institution and a statutory position that it is.

It decides. Fast and precise.

And this decision-making entity is much less expensive than the gigantic machinery of democracy which is leading the nation to hopeless confusions, unending debates, erosion of national sovereignty, bad decisions, social and civic infightings and much more.

Democracy can lead England to subordination to nations like India, China, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Japan etc.

Be forewarned.

As a last word on Europe, it is in a hopeless situation. All brought about by senseless democracy. However, their own monarchies were not that good also. For many of these nations had languages with at least a slight hue of feudal content.

An England under an English Monarch would be quite a powerful entity. Maybe Continental Europe might seek to submit to its protection. Others might also.

However, not to this mixed-breed England that is being sponsored in the current carnival-like atmosphere.

And look those realities. There are British (sailors) subjects imprisoned in India. There is no time in England to even think of these things. A very boisterous mood of entertaining, yet useless and dull intellectualism has gripped the kingdom.


Software codes of mantra, tantra, witchcraft, black magic, evil eye, evil tongue &c.

Along with a brief commentary on Edgar Thurston’s OMENS AND SUPERSTITIONS OF SOUTHERN INDIA has been published on Amazon Kindle.

Interested readers can download for free OMENS AND SUPERSTITIONS OF SOUTHERN INDIA on this link

Interested readers can download for free the book  on this link

This is not a book on any occult art. Instead it is a writing that proposes to take up the possibility of there being a real machinery behind the working of so-called mantra, tantra, evil eye, black magic, voodoo etc.   This book does not teach any of the above mentioned arts.

Yet, it does try to find a pathway or opening by which we can find or enter the supernatural arena from where the supernatural software codes of reality and life is designed and maintained.

It is a writing that tries to discuss a probability that is not connected to material sciences. Instead it proposes to examine the possibility of there being a supernatural software application location wherein reality might be seen in the code view as well as the design view. These two views are apart from the real view, which is the physical reality.

The ultimate aim of this book is to propose a pathway via which we can approach the supernatural software location, where all of reality, life, living organisms, brain software &c. are designed and maintained.

This book is not a sudden writing on any impulse of the moment.  I wrote my first book on codes in languages, March of the Evil Empires; English versus the feudal languages, around 1989. The final version of the book was completed around 2000. In the concluding part of that book, I did hint about the possibility of there being something akin to a software background to reality. And that, languages are software applications with varied capacities.

In around the year 2005, I wrote a series of posts in a GB website on the same subject. It was basically a lot of unconnected themes all pointing to the same theme. This I later published as a digital book under the name: Software codes of reality, life and languages.

Then my next major book on the subject came out with the name: Codes of reality! What is language?  

Here again the same theme of connecting the idea of there being a software realm behind reality and that languages have software codes which can directly connect to  the software of reality was elaborated. The focus was on languages being sort of software applications through which physical reality could be influenced.

Still, the theme was going forward only in very brief paces.  A few years ago, I had to write a series of posts for supporting the contentions of Homoeopathy, by basing the ideas from my understandings. That Homoeopathy does work on the principle of a software program rectifying the software of life and human body.  The book title was: The machinery of Homœopathy!

Recently I happened to read Edgar Thurston’s Omens and Superstitions of Southern India. It was at that time that I pondered upon reworking out the arguments from the perspective of mantra, tantra, black magic, witchcraft etc.

The first thing I did was to create a very readable form of this book. As I went on doing that work, I could get to read the book also.

This present book is being promoted as a Commentary on Omens and Superstitions of Southern India.  However, only the last part of this book really is a sort of commentary. Even in that part, it is not exactly a commentary. I merely quoted some sentences from his book and elaborated upon them as per what I wanted to convey.

Edgar Thurston’s Omens and Superstitions of Southern India is definitely a great book.  My writings do not aim to go against that book. This book of mine does contain a lot of mentions about Thurston’s book.

This book commences by mentioning OMENS AND SUPERSTITIONS OF SOUTHERN INDIA. However, it moves beyond to a wider ambit. It returns to Thurston’s book at the end as a commentary.

However, a mention of Thurston’s book can be felt all along.

I have used a few images from other old public domain books. These images are mainly taken from my own collection from such books. Due to some issues, I do not have the exact record as to where I got some of the images. I believe such images to have been taken from Edgar Thurston’s Castes and Tribes of Southern India.

A British protectorate over Europe ?

I am not getting time to continue my writing under the heading : Empire England versus the Evil England.

However, since the Brexit issue is heading on to a grand finale, I thought I would mention the retort I got from a commentator, when I posted a particular wording in HuffingtonPost on May 24, 2012. 

I am posting the lines as it came into my email inbox. The first line is the quote he took from my words:


Andrashka � May 24, 2012 at 7:27am�

“Actually, a Europe with headquarters in London, based on English wouldn’t flounder”

Are you proposing a British protectorate over Europe ?

I’ve read some dumb things today, but your comment takes the cake.

Linguistic unity as a sure-fire solution to economic problems…. *sigh*



Actually, I should have been more categorical. I should have used the word ‘England’ instead of Britain. Britain currently looks increasingly quite un-British.




What happens to fine Cities! The British exit!!

This is an article that I had posted on a British website on September 2006. I thought it might be nice to have it read again after these ten years.

When I was a small boy staying in my school boarding, I did hear a song, sung by the Anglo-Indian students:

Bumb, Bumb, Bumb, Bumb, Bumbay merry hai!
Ladies are nice, Gents are full of spice.
So come to Bombay, Come to Bombay, 
Bombay merry hai!!

Come from England, 
Come from Scotland,
Come from anywhere

I do not know the full lines, nor do I know whether the lines I remember are correct.    [As of now, I know the song and the lines]

Maybe it was a song sung by the British crowd when they were living in Bombay. Those times, people used to say that to improve one’s personality one should go to Bombay. People went to Bombay, sharpened their English skills, and came back entirely redesigned.

The roads were good, and the townships were nice. (It was the same in Madras and many other places in India).

Then this fact became known. There was a mass scramble to reach Bombay (and other nice towns and cities in India, including Delhi).

Now Bombay is a real mess, a suburb urban nightmare. It is generally believed that people crowd into Bombay to find their fortune. It is not true. It is true that there is money in Bombay. For, most corporate sector headquarters are in Bombay. The money from most sales all round India gather in Bombay. Yet, there is no real prosperity for most residents of Bombay. There is no place to relax, there is no space to expand, and there is no place to stand, none to sit (for the 99% majority).

There is much space in other places in India, where one can literally expand. Yet, the experiences are not like this. People really rush to Bombay, to escape the entanglements of the feudal social strings in other places. Even though there are places to expand in other places, in reality, one cannot expand, for the language system ties one to extremely immobile social positions, be it of superiority or inferiority.

Bombay is like a social black hole. Here people are forced to exist at unbelievable physical proximity, the kind of which one cannot imagine in most other places in India. In this black hole, all rules, and decorum of social living as designed in the Indian languages, gets deleted, twisted, redesigned or even become reverse. In this scenario, what one feels is not really a discomfort or distress, but the exact opposite. A feeling of nirvana or salvation!

It is a feeling of deliverance. Whereas one’s personality has to be severely twisted to the requirements of the social positioning of so many others in society in other places, in Bombay one can archive an aura of mental liberation.

Yet, it is not a real mental liberation. Only one that one gets as one escapes a most eerie nightmare. Actually one has only escaped one nightmare to enter another. But the sheer relief it lends, gives the feeling that one has reached the daylights, or that one is living in daylight. It is only a hallucination. For most people it is like taking hallucinating drugs to escape crude living experiences.

I have explained what drives persons to escape from places with pure air, green trees, the flowing rivers and large spaces, where one can literally live happy lives with family and friends.
When Bombay was an English speaking city, it had its cosiness. Now, there is no English in the common crowd. It is Marathi, Hindi, Tamil, Malayalam and a lot of other hullabaloo. Most don t want to return, to their hometowns, where again they would be stuck in immovable positioning. It is like being in a overcrowded boat, which seems eternally on the verge of sinking. There is the same boisterousness, as well as the frenzy. In the haste to escape being pushed into the swirling waters outside, one may, with desperate equanimity, push another person into the depths.

The spell is that of living right in the middle of a never ending carnival. Yet, it is nightmare! But no one would admit to it. They have not experienced any other living. And one knows the entanglements of social living elsewhere in India.

Yet, what has happened to Bombay? There are no trees; it is a desert, crowed with hideous concrete towering everywhere. The eyes crave for the sight of greenery. Yet, the common resident doesn’t t miss it; for he or she has not ever experienced it. Nor seen a green hill, or a blue mountain; or mist filled valley. A minor glimpse of these is treated as sparkling example of fascinating holidaying.

Now, the same would happen to all good cities all over the world. It is happening in
Bangalore. Yet, it would take time to see through the sparkle. For the BPO industry has brought in riches here, which can easily out sparkle any other negative themes.

The same danger looms on the horizon for the English nations. It is only a matter of time. Unless drastic measures are thought of. Actually the spineless characters from all the vile nations are desperate to land in English nations. What has to be done is to tell them that if they like to live in an English society, create one in their own nations. And not to bring the vile programmes of their own nations into the English nations.

It is not a matter of race or colour. But the sad fact is that the theme that I am putting forward is easily mistaken for issues of colour and race.

19 October 2007

There were heavy rains in Bombay some months back. The city was flooded with water stagnating and spreading terror. I think it was the second time in two years.

One of my acquaintances living in Colaba area said that his place had no problem. For, the place was designed by the British during their rule. The other places where newer townships had sprung up were flooded. There were grand designs in the town structures for water movement. But each stood in isolation to the others, so that water literally moved in vicious circles. The problem was not in the designs or in the intelligence, but in the communication gap between different builders, and also between different levels of township planning bureaucracies.

So much about an old Indian city.

Then came the rains in England. England stood flooded, with TV channels gleefully showing the water standing stubbornly. What had happened to English planner’s phenomenal farsightedness? It is true the scene was essentially different from Bombay. Yet….




What is different about pristine-ENGLISH?

I had written a long series of articles under the above heading, starting from 2014 May 27.

The writing was too long for a blog post. However, that is one of the ways I use, to write long books.

As of now, I have converted the complete Fourteen Chapters into a digital book of around 100 pages in A4.

I do sincerely think that the contents in this book do merit attention. Especially when the imminent political scene is that of all native-English nations being besieged and over-run by feudal language speakers.

Interested persons can download (free of cost) this book as a pdf digital book from the archive website.

The download page is on this LINK



Mayhem in Brussels


What is happening in Brussels is not only the culmination of long years of stupidity, conceited ignorance and sterile academic nonsense. It could actually be the very beginning of a long period of terrible and horrible human experiences, the kind of which is best kept at bay.

Over the years, native-English nations have acted stark mad. As to Continental Europe, it led itself into the same mood of complacency, without understanding.

Many years ago, I mentioned a terrific suggestion. That was Continental Europe should come under the aegis of the Union Jack and allow itself to be under the supremacy of England. I said so much due to my own knowledge and information on a varied number of items, gathered from a perspective of standing in an outside the fence, vantage location.

However, as of now, the England that I had spoken of seems a distant memory, with the nation more or less besieged by outsiders.

For more than two decades, I have done observations on a number of items, many of them in retrospective quite remarkable.

Yet, I should not shy away from mentioning that at least some of my observations could have been made with equal or more accuracy by even street vendors of Asia. Even though fabulously educated academicians would find it difficult to arrive at these contentions from their stupid academic books.

The problem that all native-English nations and also many Continental European nations face is that they do not understand what is exactly going around them.

What remain undetected are minor codes in languages of the besiegers. The attack that is being done is not what can be defended by guns and missiles. In fact, seeing gun-wielding policemen wandering around looks quite funny and silly.

When cheap labour import was initiated in the early 90’s, almost all the disasters such as banks going bust, economic failure of native businesses, native workers going redundant etc. were very clearly predictable. And also of the native social systems changing into more boisterous and ruder form.

Now, the issue of immigrants sweeping into English nations, using Continental Europe as the launching pad.

If any planned attack commences, I still doubt if either the English nations or Continental European nations have any idea as to how to stop them.

It is not exactly an issue of racism. However, one needs to bear in mind that all people in Asia and Africa who arrive at the higher social levels are people who have had the cunning to keep millions of their fellow human beings in positions of terrible social slavery for centuries. If they know how to do this successfully in Asian locations, there is no doubt they have the knowledge and calibre to repeat the same elsewhere.

Yet, even now, Britain is acting like a stupid fool. Allowing anyone inside is not going to solve any problem anywhere. The problems have to be solved at their native locations. That cannot be done unless the location is under English rule. If any outsider, child or adult, enters England, within a matter of 10 years, they will be the beachheads of anti-national propaganda, starting with totally nonsensical information on English colonialism. In fact, English politicians who are acting gullible should be held accountable. They are simply gathering problems for the native-English posterity to face in years to come.

If bombs start bursting inside the nation, it will have the feel of cluster-bombs. The place could very well turn into a frightening cluster of cinders.

Please bear in mind, in Asian feudal language, affability, exhibition of servitude, obeisance etc. are tools of conquest and techniques to breech any mood of intuitive distrust. In fact, in the northern parts of the Indian subcontinent, the Thugge cult practiced and developed this into a much specialised art of deception and conquest. This cult was crushed by the officials of the English East Indian Company. This could be done because the raw realities of a feudal language social system were seen by them in its raw crudeness.

The links to my collection of writings pertaining from around 2004 to 2007 connected to the above mentioned subject matter can be found on these two links.







Flag Counter